Subscribe to this Blog

Enter your email address:

Information Age Education Blog


The purpose of David Moursund’s IAE Blog is to encourage and facilitate people working to improve informal and formal education at all levels and in all discipline areas. A unifying theme is that education empowers the educated and improves their quality of life. Readers are encouraged to add comments.
Oct 07
2010

Message to teachers: Above all else, strive to do no harm.

Posted by: Dave Moursund

Click here to learn about Dave Moursund's free book on science and technology education for teaches and parents of K-8 children.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

The title expresses a nice sentiment. Unfortunately, often we lack the knowledge to tell if we are doing more harm than good.

Here is a quote from Judy Willis’ chapter of the recently published book Mind, Brain, and Education, edited by David Sousa. Judy is both a brain scientist of international repute and a classroom teacher. The quoted material describes how a human brain handles perceived threats.

The brain’s first sensory intake filter, the reticular activating system (RAS), is a primitive network of cells in the lower brain stem through which all sensory input must pass if it is to be received the higher brain. Out of millions of bits of sensory information available to the brain every second, only several thousand are selected to pass through the RAS—and that selection is an involuntary, automatic response rather than a voluntary decision. … When a threat is perceived, the RAS automatically selects related sensory information and directs it to the lower, reactive brain, where the involuntary response is fight, flight, or freeze.

Judy then goes on to provide some educational recommendations based on this research. In brief summary:

Reducing students’ perception of punishment or embarrassment in front of classmates for not doing homework, concern about whether they will be chosen last for the kickball team, or anxiety that they make an error in front of classmates because they are not fluent in English is not a “touchy-feely” option.

Remember, all people are lifelong teachers and students. Now, think about your own teaching style (both in teaching students, and in conversations with anybody you communicate with) and analyze how well you understand Judy’s brain science statement and how you implement her ideas in communications with students and others.

Wow, knowing the theory and translating theory into practice are a really tough challenges. I cringe as I think about how often I called on students to answer a question or discuss a topic in front of their classmates—when I am relatively sure that the student did not know a reasonably accurate answer and was not prepared to discuss the topic. The research Judy discusses in her chapter says that I was doing more harm than good!

What You Can Do

You know that the message sent is not necessarily the message received. You, for example, have “constructed” a personal meaning to my message given above. My overall intent is to provide you with some information and ideas that you will act upon in a manner that leads to improving our informal and formal education system.

So, pause for a few seconds and think about the meaning you have constructed from my message and some possible action that you might take based on the meaning you have constructed. What occurs to you that you, personally, will try out in your quest to improve our education system?

As a personal example, lately I have been reading about the harmful effects of stress. This has led me to think about when i was an undergraduate student and used to catch a cold during final exam week nearly every term. Hmm. Cause and effect?

 

Final Remarks

Spend a bit of time reflecting on what you have just read. How does the information fit in with your current knowledge, beliefs, and activities? How can you make use of the information to help improve our informal and formal educational systems? Who do you know that might benefit from reading the IAE Blog entry?

If the IAE blog entries are useful to you, then consider signing up for a Free Subscription. (See the menu on the left side of the page.) You will automatically receive email about new postings to the blog. Typically, there are about three new postings per week.

 

 

Links to Related IAE Documents

 

An intact human brain is naturally curious and creative.

Creating academic standards that that may be inappropriate and unattainable.

 

Information Underload and Overload.

Setting unreasonable standards in student assessment.

Student and adult desires for instant gratification and extrinsic motivation are significant roadblocks to improving education.

IAE Newsletter - Issue 24, August 2009.  We often feel stressed when we do not receive instant gratification. Through appropriate instruction  and practice we can learn to effectively deal with this type of stress., 

 

 

 

 

Comments (1)Add Comment
davem
Strive to do no harm.
written by Dave Moursund, October 08, 2010
The strive to do no harm title of the Blog entry is, a course, a takeoff on the Hippocratic Oath that includes the promise "to abstain from doing harm."

Any change from the status quo will most likely benefit some people more than others, or perhaps benefit some and harm others. This situation can be summarized by the statement that change is not neutral.

Thus, for any proposed change in our education system, there will be people who argue vehemently against it and others who will support it. If research done on the proposed change was sufficiently good, then it might well convince a majority to adopt the change. However, this reminds me of the time many years ago when handheld calculators were becoming inexpensive enough and rugged enough so that it was being proposed to integrate them into the elementary school curriculum. The National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics supported this in 1979 and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics supported this in 1980. I supported it through my teaching, writing, and conference presentations.

But … it was far to early to have good research on the possible long term pluses and minuses of providing students with calculators. Maybe the long term result would be less college students majoring in math, or less people going on for a doctorate in math.

The point is, each of us individually, as well as groups and organizations, routinely make decisions under uncertainty. When viewed in retrospect, some of our decisions prove to be poor.

A decision to support the status quo is also a decision made under uncertainty. Just because we have done something in a certain way for a long time does not mean that the original decision was a good one. In education we need to be continually reassessing major decisions made in the past and seeking information that will reaffirm the decisions or suggest changes that will likely be improvements. reassessing

Write comment

busy